Press and research
Cite, verify or question the observatory.
Stable wording and reusable data without implying official status.
This page is for journalists, analysts, researchers and operators who need a concise description of the observatory, a safe way to cite its work, or a route to verify a claim before publication. It deliberately separates editorial interpretation from primary protocol sources.
Recommended wording
The UCP France Observatory is an independent technical publication about the Universal Commerce Protocol and agentic commerce.
To avoid ambiguity, do not present this site as the protocol’s official publisher. The normative source is ucp.dev.
When mentioning a specific milestone, cite the dated page or the underlying source register entry. Do not generalize a country rollout, partner announcement or payment capability beyond the wording of the original source.
Citable resources
- public source register and JSON dataset;
- sourced UCP ecosystem matrix;
- agentic commerce glossary;
- bilingual technical notes with revision dates.
The source register is the best starting point for fact checking because it links each assertion to a public document whenever one is available. The glossary is better for short definitions, while technical notes explain implementation implications and should be cited with their revision date.
What we can help verify
- whether a statement is from a primary source, a platform announcement or this site's interpretation;
- whether a protocol term refers to UCP, AP2, ACP, MCP, A2A, schema.org or a payment-network capability;
- whether a page has a French and English equivalent with the same factual scope;
- whether a quote risks implying that this observatory is an official protocol publisher.
License and attribution
Source register and matrix data are reusable under CC BY 4.0. Other content keeps the license shown in the footer. Citations should link to the exact page and preserve status and date context.
A precise citation should include the page title, URL, access date and, for evolving topics, the article revision date displayed on the page. Screenshots or extracted data should keep the surrounding status labels when they distinguish confirmed information from interpretation.
Contact
For a verification request, technical interview, source proposal or documented correction, use the contact page. Include the topic, deadline, format and sources already reviewed.